Underground mining of unexploited coal reserves is on the rise in Greece, due to its heavy dependency on lignite resources for electricity. The room and pillar approach for underground mining is a conventional method that follows material extractions by creating horizontal arrays of rooms while the pillars remain untouched to support the roof overburden. This method can be economical and effective, but its implementation depends on its stability, which should be evaluated through detailed stress analysis and rock mass characterization.
This study evaluated the feasibility of the room and pillar method for a pilot-scale underground coal mine project in Northern Greece. For a comprehensive 3D numerical analysis, RS3's 3D Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used. To optimize the design and mining operations, the excavation stages were modeled in RS3 and the stability conditions of the mine were analyzed. The findings were further compared to the actual excavation responses to verify the accuracy of RS3’s 3D modeling and analysis capabilities.
The Prosilio mine site in northwestern Greece, consisted of an unexploited reserve that had about a 5.5m thick coal strata layer which was of a good calorific value, and superior in quality to other lignite deposits in the area.
Initially, exploitation of the mine started with an open pit excavation, but to maximize coal extraction and investigate further potential of this underground coal body, the coal deposit extracted directly from the pit bottom seemed like an ideal approach for this project.
The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of the room and pillar mine design by analyzing the pillar performance and support requirements using RS3.
When it comes to safe and economical room and pillar mining, defining the right coal pillar dimensions is the key to maintaining stability during excavation. In this case, RS3 was used to accurately capture the strength characteristics of rock mass in the Prosilio exploitation, while providing pillar design recommendations.
Table 1: Rock mass geotechnical parameters
Depth | σci (MPa) | mi | Ei (MPa) | GSI | c (MPa) | Φ (ο) | |
Upper marl | 55 | 3.3 | 7 | 450 | 70 | 0.18 | 37 |
Middle marl | 10 | 3.3 | 7 | 450 | 60 | 0.14 | 34 |
Lignite | 5.70 | 5.3 | 20 | 380 | 75 | 0.25 | 53 |
Lower marl | 30 | 3.3 | 7 | 450 | 60 | 0.14 | 34 |
84 excavation stages including the complete layout, dimensions, and roof reinforcements, were defined in the program. Then, the main tunnel access entries (X1 and X2) were simultaneously excavated, followed by the stopes Y1-Y4 and Z1-Z2 (shown in Figure 4).
Note: The figures below present the total displacement (Figures 5-8), strength factor and failure zones around the excavation (Figure 8) calculated by RS3.
RS3’s Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was helpful in evaluating the stability conditions of the Prosilio room and pillar pilot mining project. When combined with field observations, FEA reached a good agreement with the actual conditions of the underground exploitation by accurately capturing the excavation responses.
In conclusion, RS3 played an important role in helping engineers reduce the risk of structural failure and ensure a successful mine excavation while using an efficient mining method like the room and pillar approach.
For more details about this interesting project, read the complete paper.
Understand the needs of your underground mining projects and make more informed decisions with in-depth 3D Finite Element analysis!
Start a Free Trial of RS3
Significant ground movements due to deep surface excavations can seriously impact neighbouring infr...
When it comes to open pit mines, generally, the steeper the slopes, the greater the ore extraction,...
By Ian Williams, Ph.D. Introduction This article provides a brief summary of a 3D finite eleme...
Surface mining, whether you call it open pit, opencast, or open cut is a common method of extractin...
Looking for more information? Fill in the form and we will contact Rocscience Inc. for you.