 Home
 News Center

Publications
 Publications Home
 Online Library
 ISSMGE's Case Histories Journal

Top 10 papers
 Top 10 papers on the Flat Dilatometer
 Top 10 papers on the properties of Municipal SolidWaste
 Top 10 papers on the Cone Penetration Test
 Top 10 Introductory Papers on Macroscopic Soil Plasticity Constitutive Modelling
 Top 10 papers on the Pressuremeter
 Top 10 papers on Embankment Dams
 Top 10 papers on Active Faulting
 Top 10 papers on Surface Wave Analysis for Geotechnical Site Characterization
 Journals
 Magazines
 Featured Books
 Geoeducational Guide 2014
 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING CATALOGUES

Education
 Education Home
 Educational Websites
 History

Webbased Class Projects
 Geoenvironmental Remediation Technologies
 Selected Topics in Ground Improvement
 Rock Mechanics

Geoenvironmental Engineering
 Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation in the United States
 Biodegradation in Municipal Solid Waste landfills
 Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs): A Review and Their Use in Practice
 Investigating Soil Remediation Techniques for Military Explosive and Weapons Contaminated Sites
 Soil Remediation Techniques: Examination of In Situ Chemical Oxidation
 Monitoring of waste degradation processes for sustainable MSW landfills
 Landfill Gas Monitoring Systems

Geoenvironmental Engineering Fall 2017
 Seismic Response and Stability Analysis of Landfills
 Brownfield Remediation
 Sampling Techniques for Characterization of Contaminated Sites
 Comparing the Advantages and Limitations of Different Techniques Used to Quantify Methane...
 Electrical Resistivity Tomography for Characterizing Contaminated Sites
 Landfill Leachate Treatment
 End Uses of Landfills
 Deep Well Injections
 Ralph Peck Legacy Website
 James K. Mitchell Legacy Website
 Multimedia
 Networking
 JOBS
 Software
 GeoMap
Landslides: Slope stability, triggers, failure dynamics, and morphology  Modeling the effects of an earthquake on a hillslope
Modeling the effects of an earthquake on a hillslope
There have been many attempts to model the effects an earthquake has on a slope to assess the likelihood of failure in a given event. Jibson (2011) overviewed three of the methods used, pseudostatic analysis, stressdeformation analysis, and the Newmark sliding block analysis.
Pseudostatic Analysis
Pseudostatic analysis assumes that the shaking from the earthquake can be represented as a permanent body force applied to a slope. The factor of safety is calculated using the equation below:
W is the weight per unit slope, alpha is the slope angle, phi is the internal angle of friction, and k is the pseudostatic coefficient. The pseudostatic coefficient is the horizontal ground acceleration divided by acceleration due to gravity. Any ground acceleration that causes the factor of safety to decrease below one will trigger failure according to this analysis. The diagram from Jibson (2011) below shows a force diagram used in pseudostatic analysis.
The representation of an earthquake as a single, continuous force on a slope is not accurate. Using the pseudostatic method to predict slope stability is often conservative, but in special cases where pore pressure will build up or shear strength will be lost during shaking, the analysis is unconservative. Essentially, pseudostatic analysis is a very basic analysis, and does not give any information about what occurs after the slope is no longer in equilibrium. However, due to its ease of use, and low cost, it can serve as a simple index of stability.
StressDeformation analysis
Stressdeformation analysis uses finiteelement modeling methods to model the response of a slope to a stress. It uses a mesh and calculates the deformation of each node in response to the modeled stress. Quality of the model is determined by the quality of input data. High quality and highdensity data are needed for the model to be accurate, and if the data is good enough, stressdeformation modeling will give the most accurate depiction of what occurs during shaking. However, as acquiring the necessary data needed is very expensive, stressdeformation analysis is typically only used for critical slopes and structures.
Newmark analysis
Newmark analysis models landslides as a rigid block on an inclined plane. The critical acceleration is the acceleration needed to overcome basal resistance. To determine the displacement of a block, the acceleration record from an earthquake greater than the critical acceleration is integrated to produce a velocitytime function, which is then integrated to produce an estimate of the displacement. The interpretation of the displacement varies. Typically, a threshold displacement is assumed, such as 5 or 10 cm. Any displacements that exceed the threshold are predicted to fail.
Newmark displacement assumes that the landslide experiences no internal deformation and moves as a rigid block during the entire failure. It also assumes that the critical acceleration remains constant and there are no dynamic pore pressure effects. Analyses of both laboratory models and earthquakeinduced landslides have confirmed that Newmark analysis is fairly accurate when slope geometry, soil and rock properties, and acceleration are known.
The stressdeformation analysis provides the most information about behavior, but is also the most expensive and work intensive technique, making it infeasible for widespread analysis. Newmark analysis bridges the gap between the two methods, being both inexpensive and providing better information than pseudostatic analysis. (Jibson, 2011)