The Spencer Method of Slices was developed by Spencer in 1967. It is one of the most theoretically rigorous Methods of Slices since it satisfies both force and moment equilibrium of the failure mass. Thus, it enables more precise calculations of the Factor of Safety (FoS). Spencer’s method can be applied to both circular and non-circular failure surfaces.
As mentioned in previous chapters of the Slope Stability educational series, every method of slices requires certain simplifications to be made to address the fact that the number of unknown parameters is greater than that of the available equations. Even though other methods neglect interslice normal and/or shear forces, Spencer’s method takes into account the interslice forces by substituting them with an equivalent resultant force Q which acts at the midpoint of a slice’s base M. The assumption made by the method is that the inclination of the resultant forces is constant and equal to θ degrees. A schematic illustration of the slice forces considered for the Spencer Method is given in Figure 1.
The assumptions made in Spencer’s method regarding the interslice forces establish a more complex system of equations that needs to be solved in order to derive the FoS of a failure surface.
Firstly, the two force equilibriums for each slice (parallel and perpendicular to the failure surface) yield the following equations:
*θ is denoted without subscript (i) as it is constant for all slices.
The utilization of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion regarding the shear strength of the ground, hence, yields:
where TULT is the shear strength of the soil mass, c is the cohesion, L is the length of the slice’s base, and φ is the friction angle of the soil.
The shear force T acting at the base of each slice is:
By using equations  to , the equivalent resultant interslice force Q is derived:
Subsequently, the equilibrium of the overall sliding mass is considered. If the overall moment with respect to the center of rotation is zero, then the moment of the internal interslice forces Q must also be zero, hence:
where Ri is the distance from the center of rotation to the midpoint of each slice. In a circular failure surface, all radii are equal and can be excluded from equation , but in a non-circular surface they must be taken into consideration.
The same principal applies for the force equilibrium. The sum of the internal forces of the entire sliding mass in the vertical and the horizontal direction must be zero. Hence, two more equations emerge:
However, due to the fact that the inclination of the equivalent interslice force Q is constant, equations  and  are mathematically identical and both yield:
Solving equations  and  results in two FoS values, for a given failure surface, assuming a value of interslice force inclination θ. However, there is a single value of θ that satisfies both moment and force equilibrium and hence an iterative procedure to derive this value and the corresponding FoS is applied.
Many schemes have been developed in search for an optimized iterative procedure to calculate θ and FoS. A simple technique commonly employed includes the following steps:
An example illustration of the aforementioned curves is shown in Figure 2.
Nonetheless, advanced techniques have been developed over the years which use computational means including efficient iterative processes. The Spencer Method is more time-consuming that other methods (Bishop or Janbu) but the rapid evolution of computing capacities has made this issue obsolete.
If the inclination θ is set to zero, then Spencer’s method becomes identical to Bishop’s simplified method. Therefore, Spencer’s method is considered an extended, albeit more sophisticated, version of Bishop’s method.
Some findings that arise based on the results of the Spencer’s method are:
Agam M.W., Hashim M.H.M., Murad M.I., Zabidi H. (2016). Slope Sensitivity Analysis Using Spencer's Method in Comparison with General Limit Equilibrium Method, Procedia Chemistry, Volume 19, Pages 651-658
Carpenter J.R. (1985). STABL5. The Spencer Method of Slices: Final Report. Joint Highway Research Project Engineering Experiment Station, Purdue University in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Highways, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Spencer E (1967). A Method of Analysis of The Stability of Embankments Assuming Parallel Interslice Forces. Géotechnique; 17: 11-26.
The Bishop Method of Slices The Bishop Method was introduced in 1955 by Alan Wilfred Bishop fro...
Introduction In circular failure surfaces, when the soil is under conditions that allow fo...
Description of Method Janbu’s Method was developed by the Norwegian Professor N. Janbu. The meth...
Critical Failure Surface As discussed in the previous chapters of the Geoengineer.org series on Slo...
Definition of Factor of Safety Slope stability is controlled by 2 main factors: the driving and...
As discussed in Mechanics of Slope Stability, the most widely used approach for assessing both 2-d...
Slope Stability Analysis In this chapter of the Geoengineer.org series on Slope Stability, a s...
by Reginald Hammah, Ph.D. Introduction Seventeen years ago, in 2004, we wrote a RocNews article out...