Inzwa's *Implementing Effective Risk-Reduction Vibration Monitoring Programs* begins at __23 Mar 2023__

Create a free account and view content that fits your specific interests in geotechnical engineering __Learn More__

Janbu’s Method was developed by the Norwegian Professor N. Janbu. The method has similar features with the Bishop Method of Slices regarding the assumptions made on the inter-slice forces. However, a major difference between the two is that Janbu’s Method satisfies force equilibrium as opposed to Bishop’s Method that satisfies moment equilibrium. Moreover, **Janbu’s Method can be used for both circular and non-circular failure surfaces**. Non-circular failure surfaces are more common in nature (due to the existence of soil layers with different properties or due to geometrical restrictions). Examples of such surfaces are illustrated in **Figure 1a** and **1b**.

Janbu’s method satisfies horizontal force equilibrium for the entire failure mass, as well as vertical and horizontal equilibrium for each slice. In addition, a correction factor * f_{0}* is incorporated in the analysis and will be further discussed in the Calculations section below.

Moreover, the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is utilized to derive the shear strength of the ground, hence, the ultimate shear force that can be developed in a single slice *i* is:

Where * c* and

Firstly, the horizontal force equilibrium on each slice is established. The horizontal components of the shear resistance and the reaction of the ground below the failure surface are taken into consideration as:

Subsequently, the correspondent vertical force equilibrium for each slice yields:

Combining equations [2] and [3], we get:

Finally, the overall horizontal equilibrium yields:

Given that:

and considering equations [4] and [5] it is deduced that:

Where ** B** is the width of each slice,

Using the formula of equation [6], the FoS cannot be calculated as the vertical interslice forces * V* are unknown. To address this issue, Janbu incorporated the aforementioned correction factor

The correction factor * f_{0}* depends on the strength parameters of the ground and on the geometry of the slope. In particular, the segment that connects the toe and the crown of a potential failure surface is derived and its length is measured (

Where * b_{1}* depends on the shear strength assumptions made for the soil mass:

- C-only soils:
**b**_{1}=0.69 - Φ and C soils:
**b**_{1}=0.50 - Φ-only soils:
**b**_{1}=0.31

The correction factor * f_{0}* is greater that one, hence, it may increase the FoS by up to 5% and 12% for granular soils without cohesion and for clayey soils in which a total stress analysis is conducted, respectively. The

Unlike Bishop’s, Janbu’s Method does not need an iterative procedure to derive the FoS and hence, it can be conducted via hand calculations without requiring a computational solution. It is a method sufficiently accurate for engineering design projects which prevails over Bishop method when it comes to non-circular surfaces.

Bouckovalas (2006). Computational method notes in geotechnical engineering. National Technical University of Athens. School of Civil Engineering. Geotechnical Department.

Rabie M. (2014). Comparison study between traditional and finite element methods for slopes under heavy rainfall, HBRC Journal, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 160-168, ISSN 1687-4048, doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.10.002.

Samtani, N.C, Nowatzki, E.A. (2006). Soils and Foundations Reference Manual Volume 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. 20590.

The Bishop Method of Slices The Bishop Method was introduced in 1955 by Alan Wilfred Bishop fro...

Introduction In circular failure surfaces, when the soil is under conditions that allow fo...

Description of Method The Spencer Method of Slices was developed by Spencer in 1967. It is one of...

As discussed in Mechanics of Slope Stability, the most widely used approach for assessing both 2-d...

Critical Failure Surface As discussed in the previous chapters of the Geoengineer.org series on Slo...

Slope Stability Analysis In this chapter of the Geoengineer.org series on Slope Stability, a s...

The Limit Equilibrium Methods (LEMs) and Finite Element Methods (FEMs) are extensively used in slop...

Definition of Factor of Safety Slope stability is controlled by 2 main factors: the driving and...

Slope Failures in weakly cemented vertical cliffsSlope Failure in Metarmophic RocksHighway Slope InstabilityRock Slope Reinforcement FailureReinforced Earth WallAn Unusual Application of Soil NailsSlope StabilitySlope InclinometersIntroduction to Slope StabilityMechanics of Slope StabilitySlope Stability: Single Free-Body ProceduresSlope Stability: Introduction to the Method of SlicesSlope Stability: The Bishop Method of SlicesSlope Stability: The Spencer Method of SlicesSlope Stability: Critical Failure Surface & Design Factor of SafetySlope Stability: Example Analysis

Slope Stability Analysis

9 pages

Limit State Design Framework for Geosynthetic Reinforced Structures - Burmister Lecture 2020, by Prof. Dov LeshchinskyMechanics of Slope StabilitySlope Stability: Critical Failure Surface & Design Factor of SafetySlope Stability: Example AnalysisSlope Stability: Introduction to the Method of SlicesSlope Stability: Single Free-Body ProceduresSlope Stability: The Bishop Method of SlicesSlope Stability: The Janbu MethodSlope Stability: The Spencer Method of Slices

Slope Stabilization

3 pages

Apr, 30, 2020 | Education #### Soil Compaction Test

Mar, 21, 2020 | Education #### Step-by-Step Guide for Grain Size Analysis

Mar, 22, 2020 | Education #### Atterberg Limits

May, 28, 2020 | Education #### Direct Shear Test

May, 07, 2020 | Education #### Soil Consolidation and Oedometer Test

Oct, 21, 2019 | Education #### Unconfined Compression Test

Mar, 18, 2020 | Education #### Standard Penetration Testing (SPT)

Jul, 15, 2020 | Education #### Measurement of Specific Gravity of Soils