The International Information Center for Geotechnical Engineers

The Impacts of Brownfield Redevelopment Both Economically and Socially - Social Impact of Redevelopment

CASE STUDY: STRUGGLE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Almost every municipality in New Jersey contain at least one contaminated sites as provided by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), who maintains a list of potential brownfield sites. The study conducted by Greenberg et al (2000) included landfills and agricultural sites, but removed single gasoline stations to capture the serious neighborhood impacts due to these sites. The study also focused on a special type of brownfield site – temporary obsolete abandoned derelict site (TOADS). These sites are known to complicate brownfield redevelopments because they include contaminated buildings and land that can potentially ruin the surrounding neighborhood through pollution of the local environment. These sites also influence government and local residents that these are not livable and dangerous. Additionally, TOADS are not regulated nor secured, which lead to the existence of illegal activities, including dumping and illegal drug sales, driving the already negative perception of the site even lower. “TOADS … can destroy neighborhoods, lowering property values in the surrounding community, affecting property transactions, and requiring local government to change zoning in the surrounding neighborhoods” (Greenberg et al 2000). Some cases of TOADS include partially abandoned neighborhoods populated with the poorest and most vulnerable people with limited access to services and opportunities. Additional financial resources are needed to reestablish these TOADS and keep them from ruining a neighborhood.

Demographic characteristics of the 450 municipalities, divided into four sets: (1) without brownfields, (2) with brownfields but no off-site impacts, (3) with limited off-site impacts, and (4) with major off-site impacts, are compared in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Demographic Characteristics of New Jersey Municipalities with and without Brownfields (Greenberg et al 2000)

case study new jersey table 1

 

Table 2 shows the striking differences due to socioeconomic status and race. Out of the 46 municipalities with TOADS, 15 municipalities (dubbed as major-impacts brownfields) consisted of the “poorest populations, the least expensive housing, and the lowest proportion of white residents” (Greenberg et al 2000). These 15 municipalities also are the most populated jurisdictions. On the other hand, the 303 municipalities without TOADS, are those with the “most affluent residents, the most expensive housing, and the highest proportion of white residents” (Greenberg et al 2000).

The study showed that major barriers to brownfields redevelopment are indeed fear of liability and lack of capital investment. Stigmatization of the site also negatively impact the investment of these brownfield sites. “Brownfield sites associated with the most serious neighborhood impacts are disproportionately located in neighborhoods where the neighborhood has crime and other unsafe conditions, suffers from an erosion of its industrial employment base, and lacks services” (Greenberg et al 2000).

Add comment

NOTE: The symbol < is not allowed in comments. If you use it, the comment will not be published correctly.

Security code
Refresh
*Please insert the above-shown characters in the field below.

The Geoengineer.org Corporate Sponsors: